STORY

Why even do it?

In 2023 AI was one of the fast pace topics and every other industry was trying to induce or use AI capabilities in to their products. The story below covers how we got the opportunity to be a part of developing AI Design systems.

1
🏛️
Industry leaders discussed AI's future at conferences.
2
📋
SAP board outlined strategies to stay at the forefront.
3
📣
Employees were notified across platforms about AI upskilling.
4
AI design guidelines V1 launched at SAP, with future updates planned.

The Problem

Transparent AI labeling ensures trust, reduces misinformation risks, and improves user experience. Without it, legal, ethical, and operational risks can significantly impact businesses and users alike.

IN NUMBERS
60%

of users struggle to differentiate AI-generated from human-created content. (MIT Study on AI trust)

47%

of professionals report difficulty trusting AI-generated reports without explicit labeling. (Gartner 2024)

$332M

in lawsuits filed against AI-generated deepfakes and misinformation in 2023. (AI Policy Institute)

57%

of users prefer knowing if they are interacting with AI vs. a human. (ServiceNow Research 2023)

THE CHALLENGE

How did we achieve it?

👨🏼‍💻

Designing AI Transparency for a Trustworthy Future

I embarked on this project with a clear challenge—how do we ensure transparency and trust when AI-generated content is seamlessly blending with human-created content? I've spent years designing for enterprise software at SAP, but this was a unique and pressing problem. The rapid evolution of AI meant that users were interacting with AI-generated reports, insights, and decisions without even realizing it. The implications? Misinformation, loss of trust, and potential regulatory risks.

🛠️

How to design AI transparency?

When I started, I had no predefined framework for AI content labeling. What should an AI label look like? Where should it appear? How do we make it unobtrusive yet noticeable? I conducted intensive research on industry practices, regulatory guidelines, and user expectations to define the best way to inform users without overwhelming them.

⚖️

How to balance transparency with usability?

It was exciting to realize that my work could set the foundation for AI transparency standards, but this also meant balancing user awareness with seamless AI integration. If the labeling was too subtle, users wouldn't notice it. If it was too aggressive, it could disrupt workflows. This led me to collaborate closely with AI teams, legal experts, and product managers to define a strategy that aligned with both user needs and business goals.

Design Process

01

Discover

  • Problem Statement
  • Business Objective
  • Desk Research
  • Secondary Research
  • Competitive Analysis
02

Define

  • Existing Patterns / Use Cases
  • Design Explorations
  • Affinity Mapping
  • Use Cases
  • Design Principles
  • Scoping & Versioning
03

Design

  • Design Concepts
  • UA Review
  • User Flow
  • UI Design
  • Preliminary Guidance
  • Specification
04

Deliver

  • Usability Testing
  • Publish Design Guidelines
Double Diamond Design Process
CID

How about some desk research?

What is the level of awareness of AI Design guidelines across SAP?

26

Participants across Ariba/Procurement · BTP · Cloud ERP · CX · HXM · IES · SAP Business AI

Regions
EMEA · APJ · AMER
Roles
Designers · Developers · PMs
Method
Remote Evaluative Testing · Remote Interviews
Region EthicsResponsible AISafe AISustainable AITrust Gen AIPromptsComponents
EMEA (11)82%46%46%46%36%46%55%
APJ (7)14%14%14%0%43%14%43%
AMER (5)60%60%40%40%40%40%40%

Quick Summary of the Findings

Awareness

Overall awareness of AI guidelines is moderate to low. Awareness of RAI is low. Multiple sources for information on guidelines makes users overwhelmed and difficult to follow.

Content

Based on the varied set of users, the key need is to build understanding of how AI and RAI Guidelines can be consumed. Some users felt that the guidelines have the format of a wiki and are wordy.

Misc

Industry is moving faster than some of the topics or references mentioned in the guidelines. Joule button in the toolbar is missed by 90% of users.

Key Need

The information regarding guidelines seems overwhelming with no single place. A unified, accessible, tiered approach to AI design guidelines is critical.

DEEPDIVE

Competitive Study

Microsoft Copilot

Microsoft Copilot AI notice

Microsoft's Copilot uses notice as a footnote followed by the AI feedback buttons.

Microsoft PowerPoint

Microsoft PowerPoint AI label

Even sometimes it comes along with the title of the body assuring that users know it is generated using AI.

Instagram

Instagram AI label

Instagram now labels photos if user uses generative fill. Content detected to have AI signals will receive an AI label.

AI-Notice User Flow

AI Notice user flow

This notice pattern helps in creating transparency and assists the user in identifying AI-generated content.

🔬 Narrowing Down the Scope

Problem Statement

To design an AI notice for SAP which would be able to address the content generated using AI that needs to be communicated to the user in a transparent manner.

🎯 Defining Scope

The MVP

The MVP should make it clear when AI is involved without getting in the way. Simple, well-placed AI notices should inform without disrupting workflows — starting with the most common AI-generated content surfaces in SAP Fiori.

Who are the users?

Users interacting with AI-Generated content/outputs and workflows.

🏢

Business Domain Expert

📋

Product Manager

🌐

SAP Customer

📖

User Assistance

🎨

UX Designer

⚠️

Accuracy & Reliability

Concern over the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated reports or data insights.

🔒

Sensitive Business Data

Worry about how AI tools handle sensitive business data, leading to hesitance in adoption.

🔧

Difficulty in Integration

Difficulty understanding how to best integrate Gen AI into business processes due to limited technical guidance.

🧭

Privacy & Fairness

Worries about the ethical implications of AI, including bias, privacy, and fairness.

"As a user I want some assistance that simplifies overall understanding of the AI generated content so that I can make informed decisions."

Design Iterations

Key issues discovered and iterated upon during the design exploration.

Whiteboarding session
Iteration — archived
ARCHIVED

Chicken Pox Syndrome

The design itself was creating a lot of noise by repeating the same sparkle icon and recommendation elements, causing visual overload.

Iteration — archived
ARCHIVED

Component Clashing

It was a message strip which is an existing component within the FIORI design system and is mostly used for error/warning states — conflicting with the AI notice intent.

Final design pattern
FINAL

AI Footnote & Table Version

Whenever there is a text area or RTE used, AI notice can be represented by using footnotes — subtle, accessible, non-disruptive, and consistent with existing Fiori patterns.

Final design implementation
FINAL

Final Implementation

The final AI Notice pattern in context — clearly communicating AI involvement at the right level without disrupting the user's primary workflow.

RESULTS

With AI Notice in place

✅ AI notices are increasing awareness & trust. ✅ Users are more likely to verify AI content before acting on it.

60%

Content Recognition

~60% of users correctly understood that content was generated or modified by AI when AI Notice was in place.

55%

Trust & Perception

55% of users trusted AI responses with proper labeling.

95%

Compliance Rate

Facilitated workshops and trained teams, achieving 95% compliance rate to new design standards.

Design Standards

Improved adherence to design standards across teams globally.

What all did I tackle...

How I prepared for the project

I worked with several stakeholders including Product Managers, Product Owners, AI Experts, User Assistance writers, and Legal teams to build a holistic understanding of what "AI transparency" means across different contexts within SAP.

How I learned the product landscape

Since the AI topic was already taking traction and it was getting adopted everywhere, this fellowship gave me the opportunity to deep dive into the product landscape and understand where AI content was surfacing — and where it wasn't being labeled at all.

How I learned about designing guidelines

I have always worked on designing applications using design guidelines, but here it was all about designing the guidelines themselves. Learning to write prescriptive guidance that is both flexible enough for varied contexts and specific enough to be actionable was a new muscle entirely.

What all things went into the collaboration

While it was a whole team involved in crafting the design guidelines, the collaboration spanned legal review cycles, accessibility audits, internal dogfooding sessions, and coordination with the Fiori design system core team to ensure the pattern was ratified and published globally.

How I negotiated design decisions

Every design decision had to be backed by research, legal requirements, or competitive precedent. Negotiating simplicity vs. completeness, and prominence vs. subtlety, required constant alignment with stakeholders who had very different priors on what "transparent" means to their users.

Some appreciation from the team

Team appreciation 1 Team appreciation 2 Team appreciation 3